Showing posts with label civil rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civil rights. Show all posts

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Native American Heritage Day To Highlight Abysmal Plight


Native American Heritage Month

By: Julian Wolfson

Reprinted From The Civil Rights Coalition

November is Native American Heritage Month, a month dedicated to recognizing the culture and traditions of Native Americans, as well as their contributions to the U.S.

One of the most significant days this month will be the celebration of the first national annual Native American Heritage Day on November 28, which was created when Congress passed a resolution on January 3, 2008.

While this month is intended to commemorate the achievements of Native Americans, it also provides an opportunity to reflect upon many of the issues that are important to the Native American community.

One of the biggest concerns for Native Americans is education. As reported by the National Center for Education Statistics, 15.1 percent of Native Americans ages 16-24 years old were high school dropouts in 2006. This stands in stark contrast to the national high school dropout rate of 9.7 percent.

In addition, the National Association of Education Progress (NAEP) reported that 83 percent of Native American 8th graders read below grade level in 2007, as compared to 61 percent of Whites.

Native Americans have long had challenges in education due to their unique status in the U.S. Until 1926, American Indian education focused on the assimilation of Native Americans into western culture. Native Americans were forced to abandon their cultural traditions and embrace the value system of European settlers. The languages, history, and culture of Native Americans were systematically removed from their educational curriculum.

Attempts to assimilate Native Americans were coupled with efforts to isolate them. Isolation was primarily achieved through the development of off-reservation boarding schools, which Native American children were required to attend.

The objective of these schools was to remove American Indians from their native environments in attempt to further their assimilation. The schools were often far away from reservations, so children had little contact with their families.

These policies had severe consequences on the educational opportunities available to Native Americans. In 1928, a report entitled "The Problem of Indian Administration," (often referred to as the Meriam Report) highlighted many of the problems with federal policies toward Native Americans that continue today, including education.

The report was commissioned by the secretary of interior and drew upon the findings of a two year study by the Institute of Government Research, which examined the socio-economic conditions of Native Americans.

The report states:

The most fundamental need in Indian education is a change in point of view. Whatever may have been the official governmental attitude, education for the Indian in the past has proceeded largely on the theory that it is necessary to remove the Indian child as far as possible from his home environment; whereas the modem point of view in education and social work lays stress on upbringing in the natural setting of home and family life.

Today, the Native American community continues to struggle for influence over their education. Currently, education advocacy groups representing Native Americans like the National Indian Education Association, are pushing Congress to ensure that the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) increases opportunities for joint efforts among tribes, states, and the federal government to determine standards of accountability for Native American students.

In its call to the Native American tribes to develop a strategy for the presidential transition, the National Congress of American Indians said: "Indian education and job training should become a model for preparing our children and our workers to compete in the global economy while also respecting the values of local communities."

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Duane Dog Chapman Expected To Return Today

Afrosphere Action Coalition Worldwide Web – July 16, 2008

Press Advisory

After contacting the A&E Network and some of its advertisers about the return of Duane “Dog” Chapman’s show “Dog The Bounty Hunter” to the air waves, the Afrosphere Action Coalition released a statement onJune 17th “
expressing our dissatisfaction with the network’s decision”. In anticipation of the planned return of the show, we also hosted the Day of Blogging for Respect in Media: www.blackperspective.net/index.php/afrosphere-action-coalition/day-of-blogging-for-respect-in-media/

A&E’s regrettable reply was predictable and dismissive. Nonetheless, the AAC and our constituents remain undeterred in our opposition to the shows return as “Dog” has never owned up to what he actually said, nor demonstrated any change or shown action to make amends; but instead simply put on a PR show with the desire of maintaining commercial viability.

As the
new season of “Dog The Bounty Hunter” airs this evening, Wednesday July 16th the AAC will be monitoring the program for those advertisers who have chosen to put their brands at unnecessarily risk by propping up the position of a public figure who engages in racial denigration; after which we will continue to alert the broader public about those who choose to stand for respect of all peoples in media, verses those corporations standing simply for what they perceive will advantage the bottom line, above all us.

The AAC has and continues to “urge A&E in the strongest terms to reverse course and withdraw their support for Duane Chapan and the Dog the Bounty Hunter show. Until A&E does so, we have no alternative but to inform the viewing public and urge them to withdraw support from A&E and its advertisers. If Duane Chapman had come clean about his racial demeaning behavior and attitudes, thereby demonstrating real sincerity towards actual change, perhaps there may have been a place for him again in the public square. But on the record A&E has set before us, he has simply gotten a vacation and we cannot accept that he is again receiving a platform and further financial reward.”